Shakespeare has been dead for about 400 years. He wrote for
an audience that was just starting to get into colonialism and threw their poop
out of windows. Why, then, do we still produce/watch/read/study his plays?
Because they’re stories a multiplicity of people can sink
their teeth into. Because they have so many ways to access them. Because of
productions like OSF’s close-to-closing King
Lear.
My grandpa just died. I loved the guy, and he was the grandpa
I was closest to. And grief is a funny thing for me, because I tend to analyze
it and over-think it and rob it of its emotional effect by putting it all in my
head. Watching Lear and Gloucester
get old and die in horribly dramatic ways helped me shed my tears. As an
audience member, the play effected me in a way Lear never has before. But as a dramaturg, I have to understand
why.
To do that, I want to go back to Aristotle. He holds (and I
quote Ingram Bywater’s translation of Poetics) that the “tragic pleasure is that of pity and fear…” (1453b 12)
What does that mean? According to Aristotle “…pity is occasioned by undeserved
misfortune, and fear by that of one like ourselves…” (1453a 5-6) Lear and Gloucester make mistakes,
but do they deserve the extent of their misfortunes? Does the old Lear really
deserve to be cast out by his daughters and wander half-naked and mentally
unhinged? Does Gloucester
deserve to have his eyes ripped out? They aren’t villains, who knowingly sow discord
and destruction like Iago. Nor are they heroes who save kin and country like
Henry V. No, Lear and Gloucester
are “…the intermediate kind of personage, [men] not preeminently virtuous and
just, whose misfortune, however, is brought upon [them] not by vice and
depravity but by some error of judgment…” (1453a 6-8) So that’s pity. What
about fear, the recognition of one like yourself. King Lear needs to have his
train of one hundred knights. “Oh, reason not the need. Our basest beggars /
Are in the poorest things superfluous. / Allow not nature more than nature
needs, / Man’s life’s as cheap as beast’s.” (King Lear II.4 vs.267-270) Sometimes old men struggle with the need
to give up those things that they’re accustomed to, that give them a sense of
independence. “And, to deal plainly, I fear I am not in my perfect mind.” (IV.7
vs.62-63) It’s normal for people, when they get older, to feel their minds
start to slip. And the humiliation that can come from admitting it was clear in
Michael Winters’ performance as the titular king.
That brings us to the Oregon Shakespeare Festival. Any play
with as many access points as Lear is
easy to do poorly. So how did Bill Rauch and Company do it well? By trusting
the story, and not getting in the way of it. The Aristotelian pity is present
in the text, but the Aristotelian fear comes from finding the truth in the
text. And there’s no recognition of truth without trust. Rauch enunciated it
finely in his program note:
“We have chosen a simple, contemporary approach for this
production in our most intimate space to minimize any distance between you and
the play’s bracing truths. The designers and I are here to serve the actors,
and our entire cast is awash in skill and courage.”
It’s easy, as an artist, to get caught up in your own
creativity. It’s much harder to let go and trust your collaborators. And
Shakespeare, in spite of being dead and not having had a conception of basic
bathroom hygiene, is one of the best collaborators a theater artist can work
with. There’s a reason his plays remain popular after 400 years.
No comments:
Post a Comment